Worth County supervisors amend agenda to discuss hiring outside counsel for settlement and drainage easement

Worth County Board of Supervisors ยท December 15, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors voted to amend the agenda to add discussion of hiring outside counsel to review a settlement/development agreement, road and drainage easement and maintenance agreement; board members debated timing, suggested legal referral sources, and agreed to seek counsel and possibly act next week.

Speaker 3, a board member, proposed amending the agenda to add "discussion possible action on outside counsel for a settlement and development agreement, road and drainage easement, and maintenance agreement," saying the agreement had been rewritten multiple times and needed an independent legal review. Speaker 1 moved to amend the agenda and Speaker 4 seconded; the board approved the amendment by voice vote.

The group debated whether taking action immediately would violate a 24-hour notice rule. Speaker 2 said, "You're not supposed to act on something that they don't have 24 hours notice." Members agreed they could hold a discussion now and seek counsel recommendations for quick action next week if appropriate. Speaker 3 told colleagues he was "either in or I'm out" on further negotiation without outside counsel, explaining, "I need outside counsel because I'm not a lawyer and she's not a lawyer."

Several members suggested referral sources for counsel with drainage or contract expertise. Speaker 2 recommended contacting ISAC or the Iowa Drainage Association; Speaker 4 said he would speak with Mike Gilliland about potential referrals. The board did not identify or hire a specific attorney at the meeting; members agreed to seek recommendations and, if one is found quickly, to consider a special action next week.

The amendment and related vote were procedural approvals only; no contract, firm name, fee amount, or authorization to retain counsel was finalized at the meeting. The board scheduled follow-up to assess suggested candidates and determine whether to authorize a retention or to postpone action until a regular meeting.