Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board revokes license after deeming allegations admitted in Rosenthal case

December 08, 2025 | Department of Public Health, Departments and Agencies, Organizations, Executive, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board revokes license after deeming allegations admitted in Rosenthal case
The State Board of Examiners in Psychology revoked the license of Dr. Philip Rosenthal after finding that the department had sustained the allegations in a disciplinary statement of charges and, with the respondent absent and allegations deemed admitted, imposing revocation as the disciplinary sanction.

Department counsel told the board it had provided adequate notice and that certified mail receipts showed delivery to multiple addresses for Dr. Rosenthal and his conservator. Counsel noted the respondent’s license had lapsed due to nonrenewal but advised the board it retained jurisdiction under Connecticut General Statutes over lapsed licenses and therefore could proceed with disciplinary action.

The department entered four exhibits into the record. The board clerk entered Department Exhibits 1–3 under seal as they contained confidential protected health information: (1) an investigative report dated 08/29/2024; (2) a mandatory report of impaired practitioners received 04/08/2024; and (3) a clinical neuropsychological reexamination report dated 05/23/2024. Department Exhibit 4 was a New Haven probate court fiduciary conservatorship certificate dated 08/07/2024.

After counsel renewed a motion to deem the allegations admitted because no answer had been filed, a board member moved to grant that motion. The board voted to grant the department’s motion to deem the allegations admitted; the record was then closed for evidence. With the allegations deemed admitted, board members proceeded to fact‑finding and agreed the department had sustained charges 1–3.

Counsel requested revocation, stating the department’s position plainly: "the department asks that you revoke the license." A board member then moved to revoke Dr. Rosenthal’s license; another seconded. The board voted in favor of revocation. The record shows one board member recused from this matter before the hearing proceeded.

The board concluded fact‑finding on the matter and closed the agenda item; the meeting then adjourned.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Connecticut articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI