Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City staff proposes buying Riverside Village parcels for cyber building using DOE settlement funds

December 09, 2025 | North Augusta, Aiken County, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City staff proposes buying Riverside Village parcels for cyber building using DOE settlement funds
City Administrator Jim Clifford presented a concept to purchase two Riverside Village parcels — Parcel B (the privately owned stadium parking deck) and Parcel D (an undeveloped lot adjacent to the stadium) — with Department of Energy settlement funds allocated to North Augusta ($37 million total allocation to the city: $2M transfer station, $15M cyber infrastructure, $20M Savannah Bluff Lock & Dam). Staff estimated a combined base acquisition cost of roughly $5 million for both parcels.

Financial adviser Walter Goldsmith said revenues tied to Riverside Village have outperformed the 2017 projections in nearly every category except parking; 2024 total revenues referenced in the presentation were about $6.1 million compared with a 2016 projection of $4.5 million, and Goldsmith said the city's coverage ratio for debt service remains acceptable. He and outside counsel Joe Lucas described the legal steps that would follow a council decision: purchase-and-sale agreements for each parcel, an amendment to the development agreement to allow city ownership and a joint planning/ordinance process that would include public hearings and approvals by the planning commission and council.

Clifford said parcel D would likely be the site of a city-owned cyber infrastructure 'spec' building and that DOE settlement funds earmarked for cyber must be used for cyber-related capital, not simply parking. Councilmembers asked about wetlands setbacks, the proximity to Brick Pond, tax-revenue impacts of removing privately taxed parcels, and whether tenant revenue would offset lost property tax; staff said they had conservatively modeled parcel D with no revenue and that any tenant income would be a future bonus.

Next steps: if council gives direction, staff proposes entering purchase-and-sale agreements, taking amendments through the planning commission in January, and preparing necessary parking and management agreements; many legal and financial steps would occur in early 2026.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee