Commission approves site-specific sign allowances for Jinx Landing along Highway 75

Planning Commission · December 5, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a minor amendment to signage rules for Jinx Landing that allows larger monument signs adjacent to Highway 75 while limiting pole/pylon signs; staff and the developer framed the change as a site-specific compromise tied to safety and historic PUD allowances.

The Planning Commission approved a minor amendment to signage standards for the Jinx Landing development (southwest corner of 114th Street and South Union Avenue), granting site-specific allowances for larger monument signs adjacent to Highway 75 while prohibiting pole/pylon signs within the subdivision.

Planning staff explained that older PUD approvals and the updated Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) created a conflict for previously allowed sign sizes, and staff proposed a compromise that would allow larger monument signs at this site because of Highway 75 adjacency and sight-distance considerations. Staff described a measurement convention (a sign base must be at least 25% of the sign face to qualify as a monument rather than a pole) and recommended approval of Exhibit A (the Jinx Landing sign) and an OCCU single-tenant sign as submitted.

Staff noted typical limits and the negotiated adjustments: single-tenant monument signs up to 200–275 square feet by frontage calculation (with specific caps for this project), multi-tenant monument signs up to 50 feet in height and area tied to linear street frontage (maximum 275 sq ft), and a ban on pole/pylon signs. Staff also compared the requested sizes to historic allowances under the prior code and explained the safety rationale for not making the allowances citywide.

A consultant for the owner and Mr. Bell explained the site's historic PUD context and stressed that the requested allowances were site-specific. One consultant emphasized visibility and safety on Highway 75 and that the allowance should not set a citywide precedent. Commissioners expressed general agreement and moved to approve the amendment as presented; the motion passed unanimously on roll call.