Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Authority approves pipeline change orders and time-limited contract extensions after BLM and SCE delays

December 11, 2025 | Ridgecrest, Kern County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Authority approves pipeline change orders and time-limited contract extensions after BLM and SCE delays
The Groundwater Authority approved change orders to the imported water pipeline contracts and took time-limited actions on related contract extensions after staff and consultants described schedule delays tied to Bureau of Land Management permitting timing and later-than-anticipated design work from Southern California Edison.

Provost & Pritchard (represented at the meeting by Jeff Helsley) described two change orders: a $109,965 increase for additional design project-management/coordination and a $20,066 increase for environmental/permit documentation services. Helsley said the change orders were caused by delays in completing work by March and additional program-management tasks requested by Authority staff; some of the extra work also related to ensuring grant funds (SIGMA IP) were fully used and to preparing projections for the Authority’s 2026 budget.

Consultant Omar Dhanashie (Blue Mountain) and Provost & Pritchard staff said the team is developing an action plan and expects to return with a detailed project schedule. Don Marple (Provost & Pritchard principal planner) said environmental studies and technical inputs are being incorporated and the environmental document schedule currently targets completion by May.

The board approved the change orders by voice vote (motion carried with Director Saint Amond abstaining). For the subsequent design-services time-extension (item 15), some directors requested more time to evaluate past performance and options; the board voted to continue action on that extension to the January meeting to allow additional review. For the environmental-services extension (item 16), the board adopted a shorter modified extension — extending the contract to March 31, 2026 — to keep work underway while giving the board a near-term review point.

Directors asked staff to provide updated operational-cost estimates for the pipeline (energy/ongoing operational costs) and any new cost information that could affect future budget decisions. Staff agreed to look for updated operational estimates and deliver them to the water district engineering staff for assessment.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal