Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

AquaGuard upholds cease-and-desist for LFP Auto Body but gives six weeks to submit stormwater plan

December 11, 2025 | Norwalk City, Fairfield, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

AquaGuard upholds cease-and-desist for LFP Auto Body but gives six weeks to submit stormwater plan
At a Dec. 10 show‑cause hearing, the AquaGuard Protection Agency upheld a cease‑and‑desist order issued Dec. 1 to LFP Auto Body, the operator at 18 Pearl Street, finding the facility lacked a current registration and had not met a previously issued deadline to submit a stormwater management plan. The agency amended the order to give the registrant a fixed period to submit and implement a certified stormwater management plan and prohibited regulated vehicle‑repair activities until the agency accepts the registration as complete.

Alexis, an agency staff member, described the enforcement timeline: the facility’s prior registration expired Feb. 6, 2025; staff notified the facility in September 2024 that renewal was required; at an April meeting staff determined a stormwater management plan was warranted because the site has a dry well; the facility missed an Aug. 20 deadline and received a 90‑day extension to Nov. 18; the facility did not submit the required plan and staff issued a cease‑and‑desist on Dec. 1.

Owners who identified themselves as Ivan and co‑owner Pedro Pisa Ortega said they had difficulty locating a certified professional and cited the cost of some quotes as a barrier. They told the agency they had since engaged a consultant referred to in the record as Harry, who requested a $500 deposit and indicated he could deliver the plan within weeks. The owners said they had been trying to comply, had no known active spills, and had been finishing existing customer vehicles rather than taking new work under insurance guidance.

Board members questioned staff on whether a list of contractors had been withheld; Alexis said staff did not keep a prescriptive recommendation list but had contacted firms in mid‑August, generated a list of five firms that responded and emailed that list to the facility on Aug. 25. On the environmental risk, Alexis said staff had not observed active spills but that the facility was not yet implementing the full suite of required best management practices for an aquifer protection area.

After discussion, member Galen moved to amend the order and provide a limited extension; Alexis recommended a six‑week window for the registrant to submit and implement the plan and offered to work with the agency to hold a special meeting to review acceptance as soon as the plan is submitted. The board set the due date as the day before Jan. 21 to allow a special meeting on Jan. 21 if needed. Member Richard seconded the motion. Alexis called a roll‑call vote; each named member answered "yes," and the chair announced the motion passed unanimously. The agency recorded that no regulated activities may resume until registration is accepted; staff advised the registrant to notify Alexis promptly if the plan is completed earlier so a special meeting can be scheduled.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Connecticut articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI