Board reviews first reading on expense-reimbursement changes and hears Whittaker Bank sponsorship proposal

Mercer County Board of Education · November 24, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed a first reading that would raise the standard per-diem to $50 and add a $60 high-rate per diem tied to state guidelines; staff also presented a proposed Whittaker Bank agreement offering $25,000 for gym-floor naming rights, but the transcript does not record a final vote on the sponsorship or the policy changes.

Mercer County school board members reviewed policy changes and a sponsorship proposal during Monday’s meeting.

District staff presented a first reading of revised expense-reimbursement policies that would create separate versions for certified and classified staff and move toward per-diem reimbursements with no receipts required. Staff said the change would align the district with state mileage and meal rate guidelines and would raise the standard per-diem from $40 to $50 per day, with a $60 per-day rate defined for ‘‘high rate’’ areas under the state definition. "We're trying to make it a little bit easier to understand," a district official said. This item was a first reading; no final approval was recorded.

Separately, staff described a proposed naming-rights and advertising agreement with Whittaker Bank intended to help offset the cost of a high-school gym renovation. The proposal described a $25,000 contribution tied to naming/advertising on the gym floor and referenced terms the transcript rendered as "up to 2 and 15 years with no minimum." The board placed the item on the agenda for a roll-call vote, but the transcript does not include a recorded roll-call result or final action on the agreement.

Board members moved the consent agenda and later adjourned; the calendar recommendations (two draft calendars for 2026–27 and 2027–28) were presented for review and will return for approval at a future meeting. No final policy adoption or sponsorship contract execution was reported in the transcript.