PFMC outreach: scientists report mixed signals across groundfish assessments; uncertainty shapes next steps

Pacific Fishery Management Council · September 21, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Scientists from the Northwest Fisheries Science Center presented 2025 groundfish assessment results at a Pacific Fishery Management Council outreach session. Presentations showed several stocks at or above management targets but analysts flagged method changes and uncertainty that will influence catch advice and Council decisions.

Scientists from the Northwest Fisheries Science Center presented findings from the 2025 groundfish assessment cycle at a Pacific Fishery Management Council outreach session. The hybrid session included short briefings on five benchmark assessments and two updates followed by extended audience Q&A.

Presenters described a mix of outcomes. Yellowtail rockfish was characterized as healthy relative to the 40% management target (Kiva Oken said the fraction of unfished spawning output in 2025 is "around 62%"), but methodological changes to how commercial age samples were weighted led to lower fishery limits (OFLs) than earlier models. Several other stocks — including California quillback and chilipepper rockfish — showed higher recent recruitment or larger population-size estimates compared with previous assessments, changes that presenters attributed to new age and growth data, revised natural mortality assumptions and longer survey time series.

The yelloweye update showed a fraction of unfished spawning output of 40.1% in 2025, putting that stock just above the Council’s rebuilding target; analysts warned that different plausible longevity (natural mortality) assumptions could move the status under alternative states of nature. The widow rockfish update triggered a recommendation for supplemental review: new data and re-examination of some length/discard inputs changed the perceived productivity and led the Groundfish Subcommittee and SSC to request further analysis before final SSC advice.

A recurring theme were the limits and opportunities of available data. Presenters described exploratory work to use observer and other fishery-dependent data as indices of abundance, and they described an empirical "weighted-age" approach intended to capture variation in growth across time and space. Industry participants said local fishing hotspots and gear/market timing can create patterns that simple coastwide trends do not capture; scientists agreed spatial heterogeneity and movement are difficult to model but are being considered in planned supplemental analyses.

What happens next: the SSC and Council will consider scientific uncertainty in recommendations (including p-star choices and buffers) and the widow update will undergo a supplemental review in October followed by final SSC consideration in November. The session organizers requested feedback on communication materials ("At-a-glance" summaries and risk tables) and noted that the recorded presentation and briefing materials will be posted prior to the Council’s agenda discussion.