Concept review: commissioners give design direction on Park Street storefront awnings, marquee and signage

Columbus Historic Resources Commission (Special Meeting) · November 21, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Design team for the AC Hotel storefronts received conceptual feedback: commissioners supported street activation and marquee concept but asked for revised awning geometry (square/flat preferred over rounded barrel), avoidance of opaque window coverings, and clearer proportional designs for any blade sign and marquee lighting (static white/amber bulbs preferred).

Designers seeking conceptual feedback on exterior work for the AC Hotel-owned storefronts at 511–517 Park Street were asked to refine awning form, blade-sign proportion and window treatment strategy after a Nov. 20 conceptual review.

Staff and commissioners praised the proposal’s goal to activate the street and supported a well‑detailed marquee if executed sensitively. Commissioners raised objections to the proposed rounded barrel awnings as out of character with the building’s Prairie-influenced massing and recommended squarer, crisper awning profiles. They also expressed concern about opaque graphics that would block glazing; the design team said the glazing was intended to screen restrooms and suggested a recessed shadow box or light-box alternative to retain a window feel while meeting program needs.

On signage, commissioners suggested larger, well-proportioned blade signs if a blade is used, or alternatives that better fit the building’s character. The design team indicated marquee lighting would be static and likely amber-hued bulbs to avoid flashing or color-changing displays. Commissioners asked the team to return with alternative awning sections, scaled blade sign options and a glazing solution that preserves transparency or uses a display/box set-back to keep a storefront read.

Because this was a conceptual review, no action was required; commissioners requested revised design options prior to the next hearing.