Millard County commissioners approve timekeeping policy, purchasing-card limits and consulting agreement in routine business

Millard County Commission · November 19, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Millard County Commission approved a new TimeClock+ timekeeping policy, ratified several purchasing-card limits for county staff and authorized a short-term consulting arrangement with former employee Laura Fitch during a routine session of administrative business.

The Millard County Commission on the morning of the meeting approved several administrative items, including a new digital timekeeping policy, multiple purchasing-card limits for county offices and a short-term consulting agreement to support an assessor’s office transition.

The commission adopted Resolution 25-11-18, moving the county from paper time cards to the TimeClock+ digital system as the official method for recording employee hours. Jacob, a county staff member who presented the measure, said supervisors and HR staff had reviewed the policy and that paper time cards “are no longer going to be accepted.” Commissioners conducted a roll call and voted to adopt the resolution.

The board also approved purchasing-card limits requested by county offices: a $1,000 card for Jenna Aldrich in the USU Extension office; a $1,500 card for Ethan Willoughby in the assessor’s office; a $2,000 card for Holly Miller (position not specified in the record); and a $1,500 card to be issued for Renee/Rainey (name in record varied). A commissioner moved and the body approved the cards by voice vote.

Separately, the commission authorized a short-term consulting arrangement with former employee Laura Fitch to assist with a transition in the assessor’s office. Commissioners said Fitch will consult remotely and will sign the county’s required non‑disclosure and data‑privacy agreements before beginning work.

The actions were taken as part of a cluster of routine administrative matters; commissioners asked staff to ensure policy documents and any required signatures are on file before implementation.