Commission denies Lillian Acres flag-width variance; applicants withdraw subdivision

Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Commission · November 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission denied a requested variance to allow a 30-foot flag-lot access for a proposed two-lot replat in the Lillian area, citing ordinance hardship standards. After the denial, the owners withdrew the related subdivision application rather than receive a formal denial.

The Baldwin County Planning & Zoning Commission denied a subdivision variance for a proposed Lillian Acres flag lot and subsequently accepted the applicants’ withdrawal of the related subdivision application at its Nov. 6 meeting.

The decision: The commission voted to deny SV25-20, a variance requesting a 30-foot flag width in place of the current 60-foot requirement in the county subdivision regulations. Commissioner Michael Mullick moved to deny the variance; Commissioner Baez seconded. The motion passed on a voice vote recorded as “aye.” After the variance denial, the owners withdrew the subdivision application SC25-44 and the commission voted to accept the withdrawal.

Why it mattered: Applicants Cathy Goode and family described a sequence of events they said created hardship: they purchased the property in December 2023, installed a septic system and well, and encountered health and contractor delays that prevented earlier platting under the prior 30-foot standard. They argued the timing of a regulatory change (increase to a 60-foot flag width) left their septic and slab in conflict with the new standard.

Opposition and commission reasoning: Nearby landowner Richard Warner spoke in opposition, expressing broader concern about repeated parcel splitting in Baldwin County. Staff and commissioners noted that Article 8 hardship criteria (which excludes self-imposed hardships and financial inconvenience) guide variance decisions. Staff stated that the change to the 60-foot standard was intended to address access issues on county roads and that a 30-foot strip across the full distance off the roadway is generally insufficient.

Procedural outcome and options for applicants: Staff explained that if the variance is denied and the applicants do not withdraw the subdivision application, they will face a four-month waiting period before reapplying; applicants may instead revise the plat to meet the 60-foot requirement or withdraw and resubmit a revised plan immediately. The applicants chose to withdraw SC25-44, and the commission accepted that withdrawal by motion and vote.

Ending: The commission’s denial and the subsequent withdrawal close this specific application for now. Staff advised the applicants on options: revise the plat to meet the 60-foot standard, restructure lot lines, pursue deed restrictions to control future driveway placement, or resubmit a revised application per the county’s rules.