Committee approves micro-community resolution language requiring district coverage and geographic spacing

City of Santa Fe Quality of Life Committee ยท November 6, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved a resolution directing the city manager to propose micro community locations so each council district has access to a micro community by Jan. 1, 2027 (or a report explaining barriers), and amended the resolution to require that sites be geographically spaced and prioritize areas without existing homelessness services.

The Quality of Life Committee on Nov. 6 approved a resolution (to be numbered) that requires the City Manager to present proposed micro-community locations so that the city establishes a micro community in every City of Santa Fe council district by Jan. 1, 2027, or, if that timeline cannot be met, provide a presentation explaining barriers and recommending a timeline.

Councilor Michael Garcia moved an amendment to clarify that the resolution may refer to a single location or multiple locations (language presented as "location(s)") and to require that the Governing Body review and approve specific locations before a micro community is established. Garcia said the amendment was intended to ensure clarity about whether the city intended multiple sites per district or one site per district.

Chair Councilor Jamie Cassatt, joined by Councilors Pilar Faulkner and Romero-Worth, offered an amendment to require geographic spacing of micro community sites so they are not concentrated in a single part of the city and to prioritize identifying sites in neighborhoods not currently providing homelessness services. Cassatt said the amendment was designed to ensure citywide access to safe shelter and supportive services and avoid clustering multiple sites in a small geographic area even if the sites would fall within different districts.

Committee members voted in favor of the main motion and the amendments by roll call. Councilors also noted that the Governing Body would retain the authority to approve specific sites once proposed by the city manager. The resolution as amended requires spacing and prioritization language and sets the target date of Jan. 1, 2027; it will proceed to the Governing Body for final consideration.