Superintendent Mara Palmer presented the Salem School District27s proposed fiscal 202627 operating budget at a public Saturday meeting, saying the proposal is both "fiscally responsible" and "forward thinking." The presentation shows a 5.4% increase in the general fund and a 5.3% increase across all funds compared with the current year.

The budget incorporates two collective bargaining agreements that were not in last year27s proposal27s baseline: the SCA (the district27s largest employee association) and the custodial group, officials said. "Please remember when you're looking at salaries, that includes 2 CBAs that were worn articles last year, so they were not in the budget proposal," Palmer said.

District staff identified several main cost drivers: salaries and benefits tied to the newly included CBAs; increased special-education services, including out-of-district tuition and transportation; and a package of technology and facilities maintenance items, including a planned renewal of security camera software. Assistant Superintendent for Business Debbie Payne told the board the budget reflects additional out-of-district tuition commitments and transport for placed students; staff identified $625,000 in additional out-of-district tuition in discussions of the budget27s development.

Revenue assumptions and fund balance
District finance staff said they used conservative year-to-date spending and updated enrollment projections in setting the unreserved fund-balance estimate and other revenue assumptions. The district is holding its state adequacy estimate flat pending the state27s November 15 preliminary figure, which could change the revenue picture. Darlene Mann, the district27s finance director, said the district aligned its electricity and utilities assumptions with the town27s factors and used a three-year weighted average for enrollment projections with an extra factor applied to kindergarten.

Impact fees and tax implications
The presentation and subsequent discussion reviewed impact-fee reserves and a proposed withdrawal path. Staff noted a potential $750,000 withdrawal in the current plan and explained that leaving those funds at current projected levels would substantially reduce the balance of the impact-fee account. Board members raised that the initial draft shows a worst-case tax impact in the neighborhood of a 7.5% increase, but staff said that figure assumes no midyear changes to property valuation and does not account for a town revaluation that could meaningfully reduce the tax-rate impact.

Capital and one-time items
The budget document groups capital improvement requests in the CIP. Notable items discussed included an upgrade of Grant Field lighting to LED (the current lights were installed in 1994), dugout replacements, several elementary exterior and playground upgrades, and targeted flooring work at Salem High School. Some smaller items were proposed to be funded from project-specific trust funds (for example, the Woodbury construction fund and athletic trust funds) rather than the operating budget.

Board questions and next steps
Board members asked for more line-by-line explanations for increased insurance and maintenance lines, and for an itemized list of out-of-district tuition and vendor cost drivers; staff committed to providing that supplemental detail. Finance staff also said they would provide a schedule of impact-fee receipts from the town and additional context on the district27s unreserved fund-balance estimate. The board scheduled further budget discussion for Tuesday evening, when department leads will also be available to answer questions.

The budget presentation and backup materials (sections 1276 of the board binder) remain available to the board; staff asked members to submit follow-up questions in writing to ensure the Tuesday meeting focuses on unresolved issues.