Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

City attorney flags legal exposure on Ramp purchasing-card agreement; bank refuses contract changes

October 31, 2025 | Board of Mayor and Aldermen Meetings, La Vergne City, Rutherford County, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City attorney flags legal exposure on Ramp purchasing-card agreement; bank refuses contract changes
The La Vergne city attorney told the Board of Mayor and Aldermen on Oct. 30 that a proposed purchasing-card program (Ramp program, via Celtic Bank) contains governing-law and indemnification provisions that raise legal exposure for the city and that the bank is unwilling to amend its standard terms.

Staff explained the program is intended to replace existing credit cards with a more robust, real-time purchasing and documentation system that can attach receipts and approvals to transactions. Danielle (finance) and other staff described anticipated operational benefits. However, the city attorney said the draft agreement was governed by Utah law and included an indemnification clause that could require the city to pay vendor legal fees and forgo Tennessee statutory protections. The attorney said those terms are unacceptable for him to sign and cautioned the board that entering into the agreement nonetheless would be a board-level decision.

Representatives said Grama Business Corporation (the software/subscription vendor) is willing to amend terms within its control to comply with Tennessee law, but Celtic Bank — the issuing bank for the Ramp program — asserted it will not alter its standard bank terms for individual customers. The vendor told staff that Celtic Bank works with many public-sector clients and typically does not change its contract language.

Given the bank's position, staff said the item may be pulled from the consent agenda and presented for separate board consideration at the Nov. 4 meeting so members can decide whether to accept the bank's standard terms despite the city attorney’s objections.

No final decision was made at the workshop. The city attorney emphasized he could not sign the agreement as drafted but that the ultimate choice to enter the contract rests with the board.

Provenance: Legal and finance discussion beginning 00:36:54 and continuing through 00:42:27.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI