Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Police budget focuses on SRO coverage, Cellebrite and body-camera workload

October 30, 2025 | Alton Town, Belknap County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Police budget focuses on SRO coverage, Cellebrite and body-camera workload
The Alton Town Budget Committee heard an extended presentation of the police department's budget on Oct. 29 that focused on staffing strategies, equipment and evidence-handling costs.

The police chief said the department has pursued a second SRO because schools asked for continued coverage at both school buildings. A retiree had filled a second SRO role on a limited-hour basis, but changes in the New Hampshire retirement system's allowable post‑retirement hours (from 1,664 to 1,352 annual hours, as described in the meeting) made that arrangement unreliable for summertime coverage. The chief said converting the post to a full-time SRO would continue school reimbursements while providing more predictable coverage; the chief estimated the town would be responsible for roughly $17,080 in wages during summertime months under the proposed approach.

The department also reported several other cost drivers: holiday-pay calculations increased because the department moved to 10‑hour holiday credits and added Juneteenth to the holiday schedule, which expanded the number of paid holiday hours; fleet-repair needs and tire replacement were identified as recurring costs tied to vehicle age; and a contract for cell-phone forensics (Cellebrite) rose sharply.

On Cellebrite, the chief said the platform is changing and the town's upgrade for 2026 was quoted at $10,240 (this includes setup and transition fees), and that the vendor expects lower annual fees thereafter at about $8,000. The committee also discussed body-camera impacts on prosecution: staff explained that viewing, logging and redacting body-camera footage adds substantial work for the police prosecutor and county discovery processes; the prosecutor agreed to a fixed five-year contract to limit future cost growth tied to that workload.

Committee members asked about conviction effects from body cameras and retention timelines for video evidence. Staff said it is too early to measure conviction effects (department had been using cameras for fewer than six months at the time of the meeting) and that statutory retention periods vary, roughly one year for many misdemeanors and up to seven years for felony matters, depending on statute and case type.

The committee voted to approve the police/lease budget as stated on the record.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI