This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Brentwood Academy returned to the agenda with a request to approve baseball-field lighting only; the dugout addition was approved earlier and is not part of this submission.
Staff (Speaker 1) said the planning commission previously deferred the lighting and approved the dugout addition, and that nothing in the lighting submission has changed since the previous filing. The submitted photometric plan and fixture shields are intended to limit spill; staff said the plan shows no more than three foot-candles at adjacent residential property lines and described the colored photometric map used to show decimal foot-candle values.
Staff summarized neighborhood outreach. An HOA meeting was held at Broadwood Academy (moved to the chapel to accommodate attendance). Staff said an HOA Q&A lasted roughly a half-hour and that several families attended; three families previously asked for a separate meeting and a follow-up meeting with those families was scheduled for the afternoon prior to the next formal meeting. School representatives at the HOA meeting included Dr. Patterson (headmaster) and Jason Matthews (athletic director). Staff emphasized that planning jurisdiction is limited to lighting and does not extend to noise or other unrelated concerns.
Board members asked whether the body can place restrictions on when lights are turned on and off. School and staff representatives said the intended use is for practices (three teams) and occasional evening games and that there is no intent for extended hours beyond typical practices or a game night. A member observed that city parks lights are set to turn off at 9:00 p.m.; members indicated that operational restrictions (hours of use) are a valid topic for discussion at the next meeting and that the athletic director or other school officials s availability could clarify intended schedules.
Staff described the lighting plan as unchanged and compliant with the submission from last month. The transcript records staff s account of neighborhood meetings and plans for follow-up; no final vote on the lighting plan appears in the provided segments.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,224 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit