Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Owens Corning seeks $1.36M city tax abatement and Texas Enterprise Zone nomination for Houston plant expansion

October 30, 2025 | Houston, Harris County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Owens Corning seeks $1.36M city tax abatement and Texas Enterprise Zone nomination for Houston plant expansion
Senior Staff Analyst Andrew Busker of the Mayors Office of Economic Development presented details on a proposed incentive package for Owens Corning Roofing & Asphalt, which would add a new manufacturing product line at an existing Houston facility and require local and state incentives to be competitive with two out-of-state alternatives.

Busker said Owens Corning is proposing about $39,000,000 in total investment at 8360 Market Street (District B), including roughly $33 million in machinery and equipment; the proposal would retain 105 jobs and create 75 new jobs over a roughly three-year ramp-up (00:27:48). He told the committee the company had applied for a state Texas Enterprise Fund (TEF) award and was awarded $750,000 by the governor's office in July; the local tax abatement was being considered as the required local incentive for the TEF package.

Staff outlined eligibility under the citys tax-abatement ordinance (ordinance 2024-624): a project must provide economic benefit (city property-value increase of at least $1 million), create/retain permanent jobs and meet ordinance eligibility to receive an abatement up to 90% on eligible costs. Busker said the estimated total abatement available to Owens Corning would be about $1.36 million over a 10-year period; staffs projection based on current property values anticipates the company would receive approximately $1.22 million over ten years unless additional investment or faster value growth accelerates the cap.

Councilmembers raised multiple questions: why Houston wage estimates for the new jobs appeared higher than comparable sites in Aiken, South Carolina and Fort Smith, Arkansas; whether Harris County would grant a county-level abatement; and when construction would begin. Busker said the wage and annual payroll numbers were provided by the company and reflected local market conditions and competition for manufacturing labor; he confirmed the county had not committed to a county abatement (the countys abatement ordinance had lapsed) and that the company had not yet begun construction (construction was projected to begin late 2025 in staff materials) (00:40:12).

Staff outlined next steps: the committee had approved a motion in the prior week to set a public hearing (scheduled Nov. 12) and two ordinances (reinvestment-zone creation and the abatement agreement) were scheduled for the Dec. 3 city-council agenda.

Ending: Staff said they would follow up with detailed wage breakdowns and additional documentation from the company as requested by councilmembers; no formal council action occurred at this meeting.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI