Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Board allows 2.5‑foot extension of dock at 2050 Boca Ciega Drive after dredging options closed; requires light at dock end

October 30, 2025 | St. Pete Beach, Pinellas County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board allows 2.5‑foot extension of dock at 2050 Boca Ciega Drive after dredging options closed; requires light at dock end
The Board of Adjustment approved a request to extend the lower landing of an existing dock at 2050 Boca Ciega Drive, allowing a 2–2.5 foot extension that increases the overall length to approximately 106 feet where 37.9 feet is permitted. Staff explained the application seeks relief from land development code section 6.23(d)(3) for a nonconforming dock and requested additional testimony about a previously submitted dredging permit.

Applicant Micah Thompson of Gulf and Bay Dock Works and representative Shannon Lemus testified the homeowners pursued dredging but were discouraged by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) because of seagrass and shallow conditions; applicants said dredging was not a viable option. Thompson said the new owners discovered they could not use the existing boat lift at ordinary low tide after closing, and the extension would provide additional depth without dredging. "They quickly realized after closing, they could not get their boat on the lift," Thompson said. Shannon Lemus said the dredging effort involved multiple reports and specialists and concluded "dredging was just not possible at this property." She added the requested 2.5‑foot lower landing extension would reach roughly four feet of depth at mean low tide, which the applicants said is the minimum necessary for the lift and the owners' boat.

Board members asked whether the extension would encroach on navigation or a channel; applicants said it would not block the shallower nearshore area used for low‑speed access and noted boats typically travel out to a deeper area beyond the seagrass. The board also discussed visibility and safety; the applicant agreed to add a light or reflectors at the dock end, and the board made that a condition of approval.

A motion to approve the variance (case 25125) with the lighting requirement carried; the record shows Member Causey, Member Kore, Member Small and Vice Chair Garsha voted yes.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe