Committee advances bill requiring larger localities to incorporate environmental justice in comprehensive planning
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Senate Bill 12-54, presented by Senator Bagby, would require Virginia localities above specified population thresholds (cities >20,000; counties >100,000) to incorporate community health and environmental justice (EJ) strategies into their comprehensive-plan processes.
Supporters — including Faith Harris and Kim Suttard from Virginia Interfaith Power and Light, Lillian Anderson of the Virginia Conservation Network, Blair St. Lehi Olsen of the Virginia League of Conservation Voters, Trent Pollard of the Southern Environmental (group), and Ken Wright of Potomac Conservancy — said the measure gives planners a roadmap to identify pollution siting, vulnerabilities (for example, seniors who lack age-in-place access), and other health disparities so communities can target services and mitigation. Faith Harris told the committee the bill helps planners “ascertain whether [vulnerable groups] have access to and are able to remain and age in place.”
Stacy Gorham of the Virginia Manufacturers Association testified in opposition, saying the bill’s broad EJ definition could be used to target industry, threaten jobs, and create permitting uncertainty. She urged the committee to reconsider or narrow the scope so manufacturing and energy investments aren’t unintentionally discouraged.
Committee members debated the bill’s reach and the population thresholds; Senator Bagby noted the measure was narrowed from earlier versions to apply only to larger localities. The committee voted to report the bill, 5 to 3 (motion by Delegate Simons). The transcript records testimony on both public-health and economic concerns and a recorded committee vote of 5-3.
The bill will advance with a committee report for further legislative consideration.
Supporters — including Faith Harris and Kim Suttard from Virginia Interfaith Power and Light, Lillian Anderson of the Virginia Conservation Network, Blair St. Lehi Olsen of the Virginia League of Conservation Voters, Trent Pollard of the Southern Environmental (group), and Ken Wright of Potomac Conservancy — said the measure gives planners a roadmap to identify pollution siting, vulnerabilities (for example, seniors who lack age-in-place access), and other health disparities so communities can target services and mitigation. Faith Harris told the committee the bill helps planners “ascertain whether [vulnerable groups] have access to and are able to remain and age in place.”
Stacy Gorham of the Virginia Manufacturers Association testified in opposition, saying the bill’s broad EJ definition could be used to target industry, threaten jobs, and create permitting uncertainty. She urged the committee to reconsider or narrow the scope so manufacturing and energy investments aren’t unintentionally discouraged.
Committee members debated the bill’s reach and the population thresholds; Senator Bagby noted the measure was narrowed from earlier versions to apply only to larger localities. The committee voted to report the bill, 5 to 3 (motion by Delegate Simons). The transcript records testimony on both public-health and economic concerns and a recorded committee vote of 5-3.
The bill will advance with a committee report for further legislative consideration.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting