This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Superintendent Dr. Ainsworth proposed that the district use an outside facilitator or facilitator-firm to help the district conduct upcoming labor negotiations rather than relying solely on internal staff and volunteer board members.
He argued that facilitation is a best practice: external facilitators are neutral, bring expertise and reduce the long-term strain on volunteer board members and small administrative teams. He noted sustainability concerns — internal expertise can leave when individuals step down — and said the district lacks large administrative teams to absorb the work without impacting other operations. Dr. Ainsworth said the district has budgeted an amount similar to what was spent in past negotiations for outside counsel/facilitation and recommended phasing the approach (starting with teacher negotiations this year) because not all contracts fall in the same fiscal year.
Several board members who have served on negotiation teams shared experience that negotiations are time-consuming and emotionally difficult, can strain personal relationships and require legal and technical expertise. Board member Adrian and others said facilitator assistance would “avoid a lot of those pitfalls.” Cost concerns were raised but several members noted the district has already budgeted for consultant/legal fees in prior negotiations and that using a neutral facilitator could reduce legal and relational risk.
Administration said it would recommend the facilitator engage in a facilitation role (not to control bargaining outcomes), to provide process guidance, caucus support and training for the board. Michelle (HR/administration) said any outside facilitator work would include some board training so elected members understand their roles and the process.
Ending: The board expressed broad support for using a neutral facilitator in upcoming negotiations and administration will return with vendor options and a budget plan. No formal binding contract award was voted that night; staff were asked to continue planning and to bring a procurement or contract recommendation to the board for approval.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,180 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit