The Prince George's County Council, sitting as the district council, voted Oct. 28, 2025, to remand CSP-23002 (Signature Club East) to the County planning board for further review. The motion passed unanimously.
The remand affects a conceptual site plan for Signature Club East, a proposal by WP East Acquisitions LLC for a 16.9-acre property at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of MD 228 (Berry Road) and Manning Road in Council District 9. The applicant seeks approval for up to 300 multifamily dwelling units and 12,600 square feet of commercial retail space in an MF-48 zone (formerly MXT), according to county staff materials.
The council's action returns the plan to the planning board rather than adopting or denying the conceptual site plan. County staff records in the hearing record show the plan was approved with conditions by the Department of Parks and Planning technical staff on June 26, 2025, and approved with conditions on July 31, 2025; a district council hearing was held Oct. 21, 2025. The remand means the planning board will revisit specified issues identified by the district council.
Council member Watson moved to adopt the order remanding CSP-23002 to the planning board; the motion was seconded by Council member Fisher. The clerk called the roll and the motion carried 9-0 (roll call recorded Jay Burrows — Aye; Miss Adam Stafford — Aye; Miss Blige — Aye; Mister DeNoga — Aye; Miss Fisher — Aye; Miss Ivy — Aye; Mister Olson — Aye; Vice Chair Rivera/Ollieva — Aye; Miss Watson — Aye).
Key dates in the district council record include an appeal deadline of Sept. 4, 2025, and an action-by date of Nov. 3, 2025. County staff earlier noted conditions from parking and planning technical review; the council remand does not itself change those recorded technical conditions.
The remand keeps the proposal active in the county land‑use review process; the planning board must now consider the district council's direction at a future planning-board meeting before any final district-council adoption or denial. The district council did not adopt any ordinance or approve the plan on Oct. 28, and no additional mitigation requirements or approvals were recorded in the meeting minutes.
The matter was discussed as part of the district council's agenda for the Oct. 28, 2025 session and was introduced during the council's consideration of land-use items.