Votes at a glance: Oct. 28 Imperial County Board of Supervisors meeting

Imperial County Board of Supervisors · October 28, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board recorded a set of routine and time-sensitive votes including a retirement resolution, a litigation urgency item, consent approvals and authorization to solicit bids for a road project.

At its Oct. 28 meeting the Imperial County Board of Supervisors recorded several formal actions. Key outcomes reported on the record:

- Resolution honoring Eleanor Barraza for 30 years of service — adopted by affirmative roll call vote. (Special presentation/resolution.)

- Urgency item added to closed session: conference with legal counsel on existing litigation Rodolfo Aguayo v. County of Imperial, Imperial County Superior Court case ECU004370 — motion to add approved (mover: Supervisor Jesus El Ardo Escobar; second: Supervisor Martha Cardenas Singh); vote reported as unanimous.

- Motion to convene to closed session — motion by Supervisor Martha Cardenas Singh, second by Supervisor Jesus El Ardo Escobar; clerk called the vote and the motion passed.

- Approval of the consent calendar and approval of official proceedings for Oct. 21, 2025 — motions carried. (Motions recorded as moved by Supervisor Jesus El Ardo Escobar; second not clearly identified in the transcript for the consent action.)

- Adoption of plans and authorization to solicit bids for the Imperial Town Site Roadway Improvement Project Phase 1 — motion by Supervisor Martha Cardenas Singh, second by Supervisor Jesus El Ardo Escobar; motion passed.

Clarifying notes: the transcript records motions and seconds for most items but does not provide a complete roll-call tally for every vote in the record. Where the transcript named movers and seconders, they are recorded above; where the transcript did not clearly identify a seconder or individual yea/nay tallies, those fields are recorded as not specified.