Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Council approves six final plats and related development agreements

January 27, 2025 | Idaho Falls, Bonneville County, Idaho


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council approves six final plats and related development agreements
Idaho Falls City Council approved six final plats, associated development agreements and required reason statements during a Jan. 27 work session, voting unanimously on each motion.

The actions move a series of residential and mixed-use subdivisions through the city approval process, authorizing the mayor, city engineer and city clerk to sign final plats and related development agreements. Council members said the agenda item was scheduled to shorten a longer regular meeting later in the week.

The council first voted to approve the final plat for Sunnyside Crossroads Regional Center Division No. 1 and the accompanying reason statement of relevant criteria and standards. The meeting record shows roll-call approval with Councilor Francis, Councilor Dingman, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Larson, Councilor Radford, Councilor Bradford and Council President Burton Shaw recorded as voting yes.

Councilors then approved the Narrows Division No. 2 development agreement and final plat. Staff noted a variance for block length (the block measured about 356.22 feet versus the code requirement) and the planning commission had discussed a temporary turnaround for fire access; the council explicitly recorded that the block-length variance was verbalized as part of the motion before voting.

The council moved on to Woods Crossing Division No. 1, Aspen Meadows Division No. 1, Moss Park (referred to in the packet and discussion as Boss/Moss Park) and Kearny Village Division No. 1, approving each development agreement, final plat and the reason statements of relevant criteria and standards by roll-call votes. No member cast a negative vote in the recorded roll calls.

The votes were taken on the record by City Clerk Emily Geissler. The city reported that the six final-plat items, which the agenda estimated would take 10 minutes each, were handled in roughly 16 minutes during the work session.

Votes at a glance

- Sunnyside Crossroads Regional Center Division No. 1 — development agreement: approved (roll-call yes: Francis; Dingman; Freeman; Larson; Radford; Bradford; Burton Shaw). Final plat: approved. Reason statement: approved.
- Narrows Division No. 2 — development agreement: approved. Final plat (including block-length variance for Latah/Latah block): approved. Reason statement: approved.
- Woods Crossing Division No. 1 — development agreement: approved. Final plat: approved. Reason statement: approved.
- Aspen Meadows Division No. 1 — development agreement: approved. Final plat: approved. Reason statement: approved.
- Moss Park (listed as Boss Park/Bob Clark in materials) — final plat: approved. Reason statement: approved.
- Kearny Village Division No. 1 — final plat: approved. Reason statement: approved.

What the council recorded

All recorded roll-call tallies shown in the meeting transcript list the same seven council members voting in favor: Councilor Francis, Councilor Dingman, Councilor Freeman, Councilor Larson, Councilor Radford, Councilor Bradford and Council President Burton Shaw. No abstentions or no votes were recorded in the work-session rolls for these items.

Why it matters

Final plats, development agreements and accompanying reason statements are the last formal approvals required before subdivided land can be recorded and development proceeds. Approvals authorize city officials to sign final documents and confirm that the plats meet applicable criteria and standards or that the council has accepted any requested variances.

What’s next

Approved final plats and signed development agreements allow applicants to record plats and pursue building permits and infrastructure work subject to the agreements and any conditions placed in the record. Council and staff said the purpose of taking these items at the work session was to shorten the regular meeting agenda later in the week.

Speakers quoted or recorded in the session were limited to council members on the dais and staff who presented the plats; no substantial public testimony or contested debate about individual plats was reflected in the meeting record.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting