Richmond City Council reviews consent docket; several items continued or recommended by committees
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
During an informal meeting the council reviewed consent-docket items; one ordinance and one resolution were continued to future meetings, multiple ordinances were reported recommended for approval by standing committees, and one resolution was noted as slated for amendment later the same evening.
The Richmond City Council reviewed its consent docket at an informal meeting and heard committee recommendations and scheduling for multiple ordinances and resolutions.
The clerk read the docket. Consent agenda item number 1 (read in the transcript as "2024-three 12") was reported by the Planning Commission as recommended for continuance and was scheduled to be continued to the Feb. 24 council meeting. Item 2 ("Ordinance 2024-three 17") was reported as recommended for approval by the Land Use, Housing and Transportation Standing Committee. Items 3 through 10 were listed as Ordinance 2025-1 through Ordinance 2025-8 and were reported as recommended for approval by the Finance and Economic Development Standing Committee.
Item 11 (Ordinance 2025-009) was reported as recommended for approval; item 12 (Ordinance 2025-010) was reported as recommended for approval by the Land Use, Housing and Transportation Standing Committee; and item 13 (Ordinance 2025-011) was reported as recommended for approval by the Governmental Operations Standing Committee. Item 14 (Resolution 2024R041) was reported as recommended for continuance and scheduled to be continued to the March 24 council meeting.
Item 15 (Resolution 2025R007) was reported as recommended for approval. Item 16 (Resolution 2025R008) was reported as recommended for approval by the Land Use, Housing and Transportation Standing Committee, but the clerk noted this paper was slated to be amended later that evening before it would be considered by the council.
The clerk also stated the regular agenda contained no items. The clerk concluded by saying those were all the items on the evening’s docket and agenda, and the informal session was then adjourned.
The transcript did not record sponsors, full ordinance or resolution titles, or the underlying text of the measures; those details were not specified in the discussion recorded during this meeting.