Special magistrate finds Hanneman Family Trust property in compliance
February 05, 2025 | Venice, Sarasota County, Florida
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The magistrate’s finding followed sworn testimony from Billy Acosta, who identified himself as a Venice code enforcement officer. Acosta told the magistrate that the roof repair permit had been issued, the roof had been repaired and foamed, cleaning crews were working inside the property and the property “has been sold.”
“Based on the sworn testimony and evidence presented, I find that respondent is compliant,” the magistrate said on the record.
The magistrate recorded that the respondent is on notice that future violations of “chapter 88, section 3.3 or chapter 34, section 34‑81 of the city code of ordinances” will cause the respondent to be deemed a repeat violator and subject to a fine of up to $500 per day for each new violation beginning on the day the violation occurred. No further action was taken on this item at the hearing.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meetingSponsors
Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025
