Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board selects Dixie Roofing low bid for Stuart Burns roof; approval made contingent on county commission funding

February 28, 2025 | Dickson County, School Districts, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board selects Dixie Roofing low bid for Stuart Burns roof; approval made contingent on county commission funding
The Dickson County School Board on Feb. 7 voted to accept the low bid from Dixie Roofing for the Stuart Burns Elementary roof replacement but made the award contingent on the county commission approving use of reserve funds.

District staff presented a bid tab showing Dixie Roofing as the low bidder at $1,435,935. Staff noted the contract contains a $5-per-linear-foot allowance for wood nailers if damaged decking is discovered when the old roof is removed; that allowance had been included in the project's contingency. A board member raised that Dixie Roofing had initially omitted a criminal background check form from its bid packet; staff said that omission was treated as a technicality and the missing document was provided within an hour and accepted as complete after review.

Board discussion touched on the district's prequalification process for bidders and why the district uses a request-for-qualifications process to limit bids to firms judged qualified to perform the work. The administration recommended awarding to the low, prequalified bidder. A motion to approve the award was made with the added condition that the county commission approve use of reserves; the motion carried. The transcript shows the board debated whether available project funds would be sufficient and noted design fees and other contingencies would reduce the district's remaining balance in the referenced fund.

Staff said the district had approximately $1,276,006.76 remaining in the referenced fund (the "177" account) at the time of the meeting; staff also flagged that other contingent expenses and design fees may consume a portion of that balance. The board did not authorize spending beyond the contingency condition tied to county commission approval.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI