Senate passes bill banning use of trash bags to transport foster children's belongings
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The Oregon Senate approved Senate Bill 1016A to ban use of trash bags when transporting foster children's personal effects and to make the change permanent; the measure drew both praise from advocates and objections from members who said the executive branch could have acted without legislation.
The Oregon Senate passed Senate Bill 1016A on third reading, prohibiting the use of trash bags to transport the personal belongings of foster children and removing a prior sunset to make the protection permanent.
The measure aims to ensure foster children are given duffel bags or other appropriate containers rather than trash bags when moved between placements. Senator Solman, who presented the bill on the floor, said the measure “provides complete clarity to the agency” and “explicitly say[s] that the department may not use trash bags to transport a foster child's personal effects.”
Why it matters: Sponsors and supporters called the change a matter of basic dignity for children who are already experiencing trauma. The bill updates language from a 2023 law and, supporters said, addresses ongoing instances where trash bags were still reportedly being used.
Supporters told the Senate the change is both symbolic and practical. Senator Manning Jr., a former member of the Human Services Committee, said the bill “is a matter of dignity and respect” and urged senators to “make sure those kids ... are treated with dignities and respect.” Senator Meek, who said he was once in foster care, described the practice as “sickening” and praised community groups that supply suitable bags and clothing to foster children.
Opponents said the legislature was not the correct venue to fix the problem. Senator McLean said he would vote no, arguing the governor and agency leadership could have resolved the issue without new law. “An executive order or a good old fashioned dressing down of the director of DHS would have done the job,” he said. Senator Robinson also voted no, saying the bill is “extremely strict” and that there may be limited circumstances in which alternatives to duffel bags are needed.
The Senate recorded the final passage on a constitutional majority; the clerk recorded 25 ayes and the measure was declared passed. The bill sponsor and supporters said the change removes a sunset provision and makes the prohibition permanent.
The bill now moves to the next steps in the legislative process for enactment.