Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Self-storage industry urges law clarifications to address abandoned units and e-signatures

April 14, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MA, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Self-storage industry urges law clarifications to address abandoned units and e-signatures
Joe Doherty, senior vice president and chief legal and legislative officer for the Self Storage Association, testified in support of House Bill 340 and Senate Bill 236 before the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.

The bills would amend Massachusetts law to clarify three circumstances, Doherty said: when a rental agreement ends but a renter has not removed possessions; that rental agreements may be delivered and signed electronically; and situations when a renter uses a unit for more than 30 days but has not returned a signed contract after a facility sale. “The current law doesn't address circumstances where the tenant has just not removed it at the end of a rental agreement,” Doherty said.

Doherty told the committee the self-storage industry employs about 200,000 people nationally and about 2,500 in Massachusetts at roughly 650 locations. He described the bills as “clarifications” rather than changes to consumer protections and said existing notice requirements under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 105A and applicability of Chapter 93A claims would remain intact. “This legislation doesn't change any of those notice requirements or other consumer protections and does not change the applicability of Chapter 93A claims either,” Doherty said.

Supporters said the changes would align the statute with industry practices adopted since the law was last revised, including electronic contracting and procedures for handling units after tenancy ends. Committee members did not take formal action during the hearing.

The committee will retain the testimony for consideration when it takes up H.340 and S.236 in a later session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI