Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Hearing SE22002 continued; supplemental filings due Friday, examiner says

April 30, 2025 | Prince George's County, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Hearing SE22002 continued; supplemental filings due Friday, examiner says
Hearing Examiner Maureen McNeil continued administrative hearing SE22002 on April 30 and said the matter will be set "the seventh at 09:30," adding the session will remain a hybrid proceeding. She instructed parties to email any supplemental exhibits to the Office of the CHU "no later than 04:00 this Friday, May," language that appears in the record without a specific calendar date.

McNeil said the continuance was to give parties time to review newly filed materials and recently entered counsel. "So if there's no strenuous objection, I'm gonna continue this case until 09:30 and seventh at 09:30, and it will still be a hybrid hearing," McNeil said on the record.

Representatives on the record included Stan Brown (listed as "People's Only Council"), Sean Suhar (on behalf of Wingate Homeowners Association Incorporated), Chris Satcher (on behalf of the applicant) and Michelle Wieserfeld (on behalf of Howard and Tanya). Chris Satcher, speaking for the applicant, said the applicant planned to call "1 or 2 witnesses that we can call," and indicated the party was not anticipating a full-day hearing.

McNeil set an administrative deadline for any additional exhibits to be submitted electronically to the Office of the CHU by 4:00 p.m. Friday; the transcript records the deadline wording as "no later than 04:00 this Friday, May," without specifying a calendar date. The hearing will reconvene on the date McNeil announced as "the seventh at 09:30," and the examiner confirmed the continued session will allow hybrid (in-person and remote) participation.

The continuance followed counsel filings and late-entered counsel in opposition; the examiner said the continuance would give all parties, including the People’s counsel and the applicant, an opportunity to read and prepare responses to exhibits before the final hearing. McNeil closed the brief proceeding by saying, "So I'll see you all next week."

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI