Committee rejects proposed higher provider inflator; motion to set inflator at 2% fails

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to set the provider inflator to 2% general fund/2% federal fund failed after committee debate about workforce impacts and program targeting.

The conference committee debated increases to provider reimbursement inflators and rejected a motion to adopt a higher inflator.

At the start of the inflator discussion Senator Cleary moved to “move the inflator to 2 and 2.” The motion was seconded and committee members discussed budget impacts and workforce considerations. One member summarized the fiscal effect: “It's state, yeah general fund is 2.5. Federal is 2.5. So it's about a near a dollars 5,000,000 total but 2.5 general fund which is what we're most concerned with in this exercise.”

Supporters argued that inflator increases were necessary to stabilize provider workforces; opponents said other targeted investments would be preferable. After a roll-call vote the motion failed, with Chairman Nelson, Representative O’Brien, Representative Mitscog, and Chairman Dever voting yes and Senator Cleary and Senator Davidson voting no. A committee member announced, “No. That motion fails.”

The committee then moved on to other budget items without adopting the proposed inflator increase.