House passes education finance bill with indexing, compensatory task force and contested unemployment provision

3355856 · May 17, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House passage of House File 2433 provides targeted spending priorities, links the general education formula to inflation, creates a compensatory-revenue task force and includes a repeal date for unemployment insurance eligibility for some hourly school workers that drove floor opposition.

The House passed House File 2433 on May 16 by a 93–41 margin, a multi-part education finance bill that links general education formula growth to inflation, creates a task force to review compensatory revenue, and adjusts several grants and program funding streams.

Lawmakers described the measure as a compromise crafted under a constrained revenue target: an initial allocation aimed at supporting early-literacy investments (the READ Act) and basic supplemental aid to give districts more flexible resources. The bill includes funding for Math Corps, student-support personnel aid, long-term facilities maintenance, and other targeted items. Several legislatively appointed nonprofit grants were preserved for the first biennium but removed from the tails pending further review.

The bill also creates a task force to review and recommend changes to the compensatory revenue formula after testimony showed some districts would face sudden, large losses under recent data changes. Members from affected districts — including South St. Paul and Columbia Heights — described looming “compensatory cliffs” where per-student allocations could fall sharply because of changes in counting methods.

One of the most contested provisions in the House finance package is the repeal date tied to a seasonal unemployment-insurance eligibility policy for certain hourly school employees. Supporters said the change is necessary to hold the line on long-term state spending and to preserve district budgets; opponents said the repeal would remove an earned benefit from paraprofessionals, bus drivers and food-service workers and undermine workforce stability.

Lawmakers emphasized this bill represents an attempt to balance increased flexibility for districts, protection of previously enacted programs and limited new funding under a tight fiscal target. Several speakers urged the Senate and governor to preserve indexation and protect key investments during conference negotiations.

Supporters asked members to approve the package to move to conference committee and to preserve the state’s ability to fund ongoing K–12 needs in a volatile fiscal environment. The bill passed on a roll call of 93 yays and 41 nays.