Citizen Portal
Sign In

Local resident asks commission to allow response to governor's report on verified complaint about election integrity

3794892 · June 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Stanley Jacinski, who said he represented nine people who filed a verified complaint with the governor, asked the commission to put his group on the agenda so he could rebut the governor’s report; commissioners indicated the commission is not the proper forum but said staff could arrange time during a future meeting or in public comment.

At the June 3 meeting a resident and Republican Party precinct official, Stanley Jacinski, used the public-comment period to ask the board to place him and other complainants on a future agenda to rebut a governor’s response to a verified complaint they filed about election integrity.

Jacinski said he and eight others filed a verified complaint with the governor alleging malfeasance and misconduct after the 2024 general election. He described testifying before the governor and the state senate committee on related bills, submitting tens of pages of supporting documentation and being granted extended testimony time when the governor’s counsel invited them to speak. Jacinski asked the commission to schedule a formal time within two weeks so he could respond more fully to the governor’s report.

Commissioners said they could not intervene in actions by the governor’s office and noted that some aspects of precinct committee appointments differ from general public elections. The chairman suggested staff could identify a future meeting slot in which Jacinski could present his response, or he could speak again during the public-comment period later the same day. The board did not take formal action on Jacinski’s request at that meeting.

Ending: The chairman and staff said they would discuss whether to set aside time at a future meeting so Jacinski and other complainants could present a formal rebuttal; no date was set on the record.