Hopkins board weighs switching school‑board elections to even years; Treasurer outlines uncertain savings

Hopkins board members discussed whether to move the district’s school‑board elections from odd years to even years after a staff briefing on the possible benefits and costs.

Presentation: Treasurer Hartland presented background, including a University of Minnesota study and examples from neighboring cities. The district’s financial adviser told staff the district might reduce election costs by aligning with county/city election schedules, but analysts had not completed a detailed estimate of likely savings. The board’s memo noted that only about 10% of Minnesota school districts remain on odd‑year elections and that municipalities moving to even years typically cite higher turnout and a broader demographic mix of voters.

Local context: Staff reported that Hopkins and some neighboring cities decided to remain on odd‑year municipal ballots this cycle; Edina’s 2024 experience was cited where the city charged Edina Public Schools $153,000 for election services but the city believed costs were likely higher when including staff time and indirect costs.

Legislative angle: Board members asked whether the Legislature might mandate a statewide change. Treasurer Hartland said the issue was not a priority in the current biennium but could resurface if legislators prioritize it.

Board direction: No decision was made; board members asked staff for more detailed cost estimates and analysis of likely savings and equity impacts before any formal action. Board members also suggested further community outreach to explain trade‑offs and potential effects on turnout and bond/referendum timing.

Speakers included Treasurer Hartland, members of the board and business services staff. Staff flagged that if the board seeks a definitive dollar estimate, Ehlers would need additional authorization to analyze the impact in detail.