Payroll vendor pitches PayEntry platform to Bourbon County; commissioners raise integration and procurement questions

5436480 · July 22, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Emerson and Company presented PayEntry payroll and HR tools as a candidate to replace the county's payroll/benefits system. Vendor said PayEntry offers a dedicated account advocate and onboarding support; county staff asked about general ledger/import formats, KPERS integration and whether services should be competitively bid.

Emerson and Company presented a payroll and HR services proposal to Bourbon County commissioners on July 21, describing PayEntry — a payroll and benefits administration platform — as the vendor the consultant recommends for county payroll and time‑and‑attendance functions.

Presenter Tim Emerson Jr., who identified himself as owner of Emerson and Company in Kansas City, said Emerson acts as a service bureau and recommended PayEntry because it offers a dedicated account advocate and an integrated benefits administration interface. "One thing that we typically would like to do is we would recommend that departments, somebody in each department, would be responsible for submitting the time and attendance," Emerson said, describing how PayEntry can handle geo‑fenced mobile punches, tablet or IP‑based clocking and optional biometric add‑ons.

County department heads and staff raised questions about technical integration. The county's payroll/accounting system does not accept direct imports, so staff asked how payroll files would be exported and posted; Emerson said PayEntry can produce CSV or Excel exports and that Emerson's team can map outputs to the county's chart of accounts to create journal entries. Commissioners and department heads asked about KPERS pension deductions and how healthcare and FSA/HSA arrangements would be handled; Emerson said PayEntry can manage deductions and provide allocation reports and that PayEntry’s team would work with brokers and third‑party benefit vendors to reconcile enrollments and billing.

Procurement questions: Several commissioners asked why the county was considering a single vendor and whether the work should be put out to formal bid. One commissioner said the county's budget process had not included this expense and that department heads had not been consulted; another asked whether the county should solicit other proposals for ADP, Paychex or other platforms. Emerson said he was willing to submit quotes for other platforms and that Emerson works with multiple payroll platforms.

Next steps: Emerson recommended a software demonstration and a discovery process to identify the county's needs and to plan timeline. Emerson suggested a start at the beginning of a quarter (October 1 or January 1) if the commission decides to move forward. No procurement decision or vote occurred at the July 21 meeting.

Speakers quoted in this piece are identified in the meeting transcript.