Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Flagstaff Sustainability Commission begins review of 31 grant applications, sets Nov. 14 scoring deadline

October 24, 2025 | Flagstaff City, Coconino County, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Flagstaff Sustainability Commission begins review of 31 grant applications, sets Nov. 14 scoring deadline
The Flagstaff Sustainability Commission received a step‑by‑step briefing Oct. 20 on the city’s Sustainability Grant (FSG) review process and scoring rubric, after the sustainability office said 31 applications were submitted this year.

Jenny Niemann, Climate Action Section Director for the City of Flagstaff, and Diane Bridger, the new sustainability engagement specialist who is serving as the commission liaison, walked commissioners through the online grant folder, an updated scoring spreadsheet and a timeline that staff will use to collect clarifying questions from applicants. Bridger told the commission each reviewer was assigned roughly 11–12 grants and that all reviewer scores and any questions for applicants are due to staff by Nov. 14; staff plans a scoring discussion Nov. 20.

Niemann and Bridger said the scoring tool is based on the rubric the commission previously approved; it highlights where reviewers should enter values, includes a one‑point bonus for projects that meaningfully involve community goals, and integrates a space for questions to applicants. Bridger said staff is conducting an eligibility and compliance screening concurrently and will reach out to applicants to resolve questions that might affect eligibility.

Commissioners were instructed to score each application against the rubric rather than by comparing applications to one another, and staff emphasized consistency across a single reviewer’s scores is more important than identical scores between different reviewers. The commission also completed a brief bias‑mitigation review that included conflict‑of‑interest disclosures and guidance about avoiding outside research while scoring.

Bridger said the grant evaluation materials are posted in a Google Drive folder and that staff will redistribute permissions so each reviewer can access their scoring worksheet. She also asked reviewers to reference page and paragraph numbers when justifying scores to speed the group discussion at the November meeting.

The commission approved the minutes from its September meeting at the start of the session.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Arizona articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI