Commissioners debate using opioid-settlement funds for school activity buses; decision deferred to next meeting
January 02, 2025 | Hampshire County, West Virginia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Hampshire County commissioners debated whether to use opioid-settlement funds to cover a persistent deficit in the school system’s activity bus service and opted to continue the item to the next meeting so the Board of Education can provide metrics.
Commissioner Mance outlined a proposal to transfer $10,000 from the county’s opioid-settlement funds to the Hampshire County Board of Education to support transportation for after-school activities in fiscal years 2025 and 2026. He told the commission the activity-bus program “tallies up to a looks like a little over $30,000 a year” and said a carve-out in the approved uses attached to the opioid MOU permits funding of school- and youth-focused prevention and activity programs. “That’s essentially a, a carve out and an awesome lifeline for us to use,” Mance said while reading the relevant subsection of the MOU.
Clerk Scribe reported the opioid fund balance as $59,619.40 as of Nov. 30. Several commissioners urged more information before acting: one commissioner asked for metrics on how many students would be served and noted the semester was starting, while another favored a larger use of funds paired with an outstanding West Virginia First Foundation grant to repurpose and outfit a Board of Education building so the sheriff’s department and day-report operations could co-locate. That commissioner said the paired plan could save the school district demolition costs and provide sustained space for multiple county services; a $700,000 grant application had been submitted to West Virginia First Foundation and officials expected a possible second-round decision in spring.
Commissioner Mance’s $10,000 transfer proposal was introduced but not voted on. Instead the commission voted 2–1 to continue the item to the next meeting and request that a school-board representative attend with more detailed metrics and cost figures before any transfer is approved.
The commission recorded the continuation by motion, and the clerk noted follow-up steps: invite the school board to present projected student impact and a shortfall schedule, and re-place the item on a future agenda for a recorded vote.
Commissioner Mance outlined a proposal to transfer $10,000 from the county’s opioid-settlement funds to the Hampshire County Board of Education to support transportation for after-school activities in fiscal years 2025 and 2026. He told the commission the activity-bus program “tallies up to a looks like a little over $30,000 a year” and said a carve-out in the approved uses attached to the opioid MOU permits funding of school- and youth-focused prevention and activity programs. “That’s essentially a, a carve out and an awesome lifeline for us to use,” Mance said while reading the relevant subsection of the MOU.
Clerk Scribe reported the opioid fund balance as $59,619.40 as of Nov. 30. Several commissioners urged more information before acting: one commissioner asked for metrics on how many students would be served and noted the semester was starting, while another favored a larger use of funds paired with an outstanding West Virginia First Foundation grant to repurpose and outfit a Board of Education building so the sheriff’s department and day-report operations could co-locate. That commissioner said the paired plan could save the school district demolition costs and provide sustained space for multiple county services; a $700,000 grant application had been submitted to West Virginia First Foundation and officials expected a possible second-round decision in spring.
Commissioner Mance’s $10,000 transfer proposal was introduced but not voted on. Instead the commission voted 2–1 to continue the item to the next meeting and request that a school-board representative attend with more detailed metrics and cost figures before any transfer is approved.
The commission recorded the continuation by motion, and the clerk noted follow-up steps: invite the school board to present projected student impact and a shortfall schedule, and re-place the item on a future agenda for a recorded vote.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting