The Lakeville Conservation Commission took the following formal actions at its Jan. 14 meeting.

1) 3 Mona Street (SE 192933) — Motion to continue the after‑the‑fact Notice of Intent to Feb. 11 at 6:30 p.m. at the Lakeville Police Station. Motion carried (recorded ayes on the audio). Next step: site visit and applicant to provide compensatory storage options. (See article on 3 Mona Street.)

2) 24 Bedford Street (SE 192891) — Motion to issue the order of conditions with an added required condition that disturbed slopes and landscaped areas be loomed and seeded with a native hydroseed mix or stabilized with erosion control blankets. Motion carried (recorded ayes on the audio). Staff to sign and record the order.

3) 74 Lakeside Ave (SE 192931) — Motion to continue to Jan. 28 at 6:30 p.m.; motion carried.

4) Route 18/79 (Myrick Street / Rhode Island Road project) — Motion to close the hearing and issue an order of conditions with a 45‑day period to incorporate Taunton Conservation Commission conditions, Army Corps of Engineers authorization, and MassDOT comments prior to the start of construction. Motion carried. Applicant must provide required agency letters before construction begins.

5) 51 Shore Avenue (RDA) — Motion to continue to Jan. 28 at 6:30 p.m.; applicant to provide dewatering/tanker plan, a delineated dewatering area, siltation controls and agent notification, and to appear in person.

6) 160 Bedford Street (enforcement/NOI) — Motion to continue to Jan. 28; commission requested certified removal manifests and a limited removal action report after contaminated soil removal and asked staff to obtain a peer review estimate.

7) 9 Cross Street — Motion to continue to Jan. 28; owner asked to provide deed‑restriction language for legal review by town counsel; stop‑work remains in place until recording and required conditions are met.

8) Meeting minutes for Sept. 10, Sept. 24 and Oct. 22, 2024 — Motion to approve minutes as presented; motion carried.

9) Adjournment — Motion to adjourn carried.

Notes: Where the transcript records only “aye” responses the audio showed the motion carried; individual roll‑call vote details were not read on the record for each motion.