This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Planning board members on Jan. 14 provided updates on multiple housing and redevelopment projects in Millis, reporting potential new units that could affect the town’s affordable-housing calculations and noting a settlement tied to a project at 114 Union Street.
A board member summarized several proposals: Stony Brook may seek to add roughly 100–160 units, likely using Chapter 40B; another project adjacent to the bowling alley is expected to include about 34 or more rental units; a downtown project (the former Bada Bings site) is advancing with the roof going on and would yield about 20 or more rental units; and a separate proposal off Village Street could produce roughly 16–20 single-family homes depending on whether it is filed as a conventional subdivision or a cluster development. The meeting also referenced a 98-unit rental project that planning staff said would count toward the town’s housing percentage if permits advance.
Board members discussed the town’s “safe harbor” status for affordable-housing percentage and said the town’s current calculated share stood at about 8.8%. Board members noted that projects not yet fully permitted may or may not be counted in official totals until permits are issued.
The town administrator reported that the town has reached a settlement with the project at 114 Union Street and that the developer plans to approach the Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) soon to refile for a permit; the town administrator said the settlement funds would be directed to support PFAS treatment infrastructure but that details cannot be publicly stated until the developer secures the required permit. Planning board members emphasized that the 114 Union Street matter is principally a Zoning Board of Appeals issue and that any settlement would take effect after permit issuance.
Board members said they would monitor the permit progress for these projects; no planning-board approvals were issued for the projects at the Jan. 14 meeting beyond the informational updates.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,224 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit