This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Pensacola Environmental Advisory Board discussed an add-on item asking whether the city's tree-planting trust fund can be used to pay for landscape design along roughly a one-mile section of Bayfront Parkway affected by a Sun Trail project. The item was added to the agenda for discussion only; staff said legal counsel is reviewing whether the trust-fund ordinance permits paying for design work.
Don, a staff member, prefaced the discussion by saying legal was "taking a look at" whether the tree-planting trust fund can be used for design. Board members and staff noted the distinction between paying for design work up front and paying later for tree installation.
City staff described the Bayfront segment as part of a larger Sun Trail roadway redesign that will remove existing landscaping. Staff said some federal or state project funding for the Sun Trail does not cover planting; staff therefore asked whether trust-fund dollars could cover design so the city could ensure replacement landscaping is coordinated with the roadway and trail design. Wendy Gavin and other staff noted that the Sun Trail grant cannot pay for planting and that staff are exploring alternate sources.
Staff provided an order-of-magnitude figure of about $75,000 as a design estimate for the mile-long section under discussion; staff said the project is roughly 90% complete on engineering and the landscape design is still being finalized. Board members raised safety and sight-line issues and noted that trees can only be planted where there is sufficient physical clearance for safe vehicle and pedestrian interactions.
Board members asked staff to return with cross sections or more complete design plans before committing trust-fund money to design. The board did not take a formal vote; staff said they will continue to refine the scope and return with additional information and that legal counsel will advise whether design is an eligible expenditure under the current code.
The discussion also touched on equity and prioritization: a provision in the city code gives first priority to restoring canopy where funds were generated, and some board members said they want to avoid the perception that trust-fund dollars funnel only into downtown projects. Staff said the city is reviewing the land development code and could consider modifying language on eligible uses.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,224 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit