Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Bill to allow voluntary community‑property trusts advances in committee hearing with bankers’ amendment

January 15, 2025 | Judiciary, House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill to allow voluntary community‑property trusts advances in committee hearing with bankers’ amendment
Rep. Dan McGuire told the House Judiciary Committee that House Bill 88 would let married couples create an optional community‑property trust to preserve a federal income‑tax step‑up in basis when one spouse dies.

McGuire said the measure targets a specific federal tax treatment that benefits couples in nine community‑property states, where the surviving spouse receives a stepped‑up basis for the entire asset rather than half. “If you live in New Hampshire, the IRS treats the surviving spouse as owning half of the asset from the start,” McGuire told members, explaining the tax difference he said the trust would address.

Under McGuire’s proposal, a married couple could transfer assets into a community‑property trust so the survivor could receive the full step up in basis at death; the sponsor described the change as optional and suggested it would mainly affect couples doing estate planning.

Banking representatives asked the committee to adopt a technical amendment to protect creditors and lien holders if property subject to a mortgage is placed into a trust. Ryan Hale of the New Hampshire Bankers Association and Rob Dietel, outside counsel, described language that preserves lenders’ security interests and clarified lien treatment for obligations incurred before or during marriage.

McGuire supported the amendment and agreed to research a fiscal‑note question raised in committee about whether transfers into the trust would trigger real‑estate transfer taxes. The sponsor said he expects most instances to be non‑taxable, but he would seek clarification from the Department of Revenue or fiscal staff.

Ending: The committee heard no public opposition during the session and closed the hearing on HB 88 after a short question period; McGuire agreed to provide follow‑up on any fiscal and drafting questions the committee raised.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI