Senators on the floor voted to approve a second‑reading amendment to Senate File 4, the State Park Peace Officers bill, adding statutory limits on when park rangers may exercise law‑enforcement authority outside park boundaries.
The amendment, offered in committee and moved on the floor as second reading amendment number 1, keeps park rangers' ability to respond when they observe a felony or a DUI in their presence, allows them to assist other agencies when requested and preserves hot‑pursuit authority. Supporters said the changes align park ranger authority with existing game warden statutes and avoid creating an expansive new statewide law‑enforcement force.
The amendment's sponsor said the change was intended to prevent park rangers from having "full jurisdiction and authority to do full investigative, full law enforcement activities throughout the entire state," and to make the statute consistent with other peace‑officer frameworks. Several senators described it as a compromise that balances public‑safety needs in remote areas with limits on extraterritorial authority.
Senators who spoke during the debate raised practical concerns about emergency response in rural parks where the nearest deputy may be far away. Senator Landon said that some parks see tens of thousands of visitors on summer weekends and questioned whether restrictive language could hamper an available ranger from securing a scene when local law enforcement is distant. Other senators responded by pointing to existing statutory provisions and Good Samaritan protections that already allow peace officers to render assistance outside their jurisdiction in particular circumstances.
Senator Olson (chairing the judiciary committee) and others referenced Wyoming statutory language described on the floor as governing "extraterritorial authority and peace officers," noting that statutes include conditions when a peace officer outside their jurisdiction may act — such as responding to a request for assistance, a specific request to assist a peace officer, fresh pursuit, or when there is reasonable cause to believe a crime posing immediate threat is occurring. The sponsor said the amendment was modeled after game warden statutes and that further tweaks could be made on third reading if needed.
The amendment passed on a voice vote. Senators said the amendment leaves the rangers able to respond to emergency crashes, violent crimes and pursue suspects, but narrows the circumstances under which they would proactively operate outside park boundaries without a request.