At a session of the 2025 Legislature CT, an unidentified speaker read a series of proposed bills and announced committee referrals; the provided transcript segment lists the measures and their intended referral committees but does not record formal vote tallies or final dispositions for most items.

The most direct passage in the transcript, attributed to Speaker 1, lists a set of bills and the committees to which they would be referred. Speaker 1 said, “I move on to Idem 4 SX, are Agenta. Ви gon't to rayse the block bils for Change of reference. . . proposed HP Norfifitax exemtions for Farmere Machineery, that is being refeded of Finance.” In the same reading the speaker continued through multiple numbered items, naming committees such as Finance, Housing and others and referencing several bill numbers and topics (transcript excerpted verbatim where wording was unclear).

Why it matters: committee referrals determine where legislation is reviewed, which shapes whether measures reach floor consideration. The transcript segment documents which committees were named for each listed item but does not provide debate, sponsor identifications, or recorded votes for most measures.

Details from the reading include a range of topics and partial bill references as read aloud in the transcript: exemptions or tax items (read as “HP Norfifitax”), municipal and technical statutory revisions (read as “technical revisions to Statchut concerning laning and development”), stormwater discharge compliance assistance, requirements about posting of a fairing commission bylaw, building inspector administration, and measures described with partial or garbled identifiers such as “Canapil No 2-2 -2axing,” “Canapil номер 234,” “Canapil номер 3,” “Nober spP Nopor номер 3,” and others. Because the transcript contains multiple garbled or nonstandard renderings of bill names and numbers, this article reproduces the wording of the reading where the record is unclear and flags those items as “text as read” in clarifying details below.

The transcript segment shows the body reading the list in sequence and then a short exchange consistent with calling for any objections or a voice response, including brief utterances such as “Are there any objection? Всіх нам. Але thave en favor?” and later “No. No? Oka.” The segment does not explicitly record a formal recorded roll-call vote, mover/second attributions, or the final disposition (passed, failed, tabled) for most of the listed bills in the supplied excerpt.

The meeting segment includes no extended debate about the merits of any individual bill, no sponsors identified by name, and no committee reports recorded in the provided excerpt. Where the transcript is unclear or garbled, this article does not correct or infer the intended statutory names or bill numbers beyond noting the committee named by the reader.

Votes at a glance: The transcript excerpt lists multiple bills and their announced committee referrals but does not provide complete vote tallies, sponsor names, or vote records for those items. Final dispositions and formal vote records are not specified in the supplied transcript segment.

What’s next: The measures listed in the reading are, per the transcript, to proceed to the committees named by the reader. Committee consideration, debate, amendment and any formal votes were not captured in the provided excerpt.