Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Humboldt County Board of Supervisors recesses to closed session on Potter Valley hydropower litigation; no reportable action

January 18, 2025 | Humboldt County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Humboldt County Board of Supervisors recesses to closed session on Potter Valley hydropower litigation; no reportable action
The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors recessed into closed session to discuss existing litigation involving the Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Project No. 77-285), County Counsel said, and later reported no reportable action.

County Counsel told the board the closed session was held pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) to discuss the existing litigation over the Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project. "It is the intention of the board to meet in closed session pursuant to California government code section 54956.9 D1 in order to discuss existing litigation in the matter of the Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project number 77-285," County Counsel said during the meeting.

The meeting began with roll call and the Pledge of Allegiance. Supervisor Arroyo, Supervisor Bone, Supervisor McGram and Supervisor Wilson answered present after Chair Bushnell called the meeting to order and asked Nikki to conduct the roll call. County Counsel estimated the closed session would last about two hours and confirmed there were no public comments in the room or on Zoom before the board recessed.

After returning from closed session, County Counsel reported to the board: "There was no reportable action taken with regards to item C1." The board then adjourned.

No motions, votes or formal directives relating to the litigation were recorded in the public transcript; County Counsel’s statements are the only public disclosures about the closed-session item in the record.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal