This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Louisa County Board of Supervisors voted to refrain from intervening in a condemnation proceeding that would create an easement across a county-owned FEMA buyout lot.
County legal counsel described an amended filing that adds the county as a party because the proposed easement crosses land previously purchased through a FEMA buyout program. Counsel explained that the county previously had not been named and that the question before the board was whether to intervene to assert county property interests or to allow the condemnation process to proceed without opposition.
After discussion about the history of the parcel, restrictions tied to FEMA buyout lots and whether the county had plans for the property, a supervisor moved for a resolution not to intervene and to allow the condemnation to proceed. The motion was seconded and carried on a voice vote recorded as "aye." The transcript records the board's direction as "we're not gonna fight it" and states that supervisors will let the legal process proceed rather than mounting opposition.
Board members and counsel noted limits that may apply to improvements on FEMA buyout lots (for example, restrictions on paving or adding gravel to such parcels), and they discussed that some of the affected land was originally acquired by FEMA following floods and sold as part of the buyout process. The board did not specify any financial settlement figures or alternative access plans on the record.
Outcome
- Motion: Do not intervene in condemnation on the FEMA buyout lot; allow the condemnation/easement process to proceed without county opposition. - Moved: not specified. Seconded: not specified. Vote: motion carried (voice vote recorded as "aye").
The decision means county staff and counsel will not file opposing pleadings in the condemnation matter; the board did not direct additional legal action or set conditions on the county's non-opposition on the record.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,224 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit