Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Bill would bring thermal energy networks under UTC oversight and require utilities to plan for them

January 27, 2025 | Environment & Energy, House of Representatives, Legislative Sessions, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would bring thermal energy networks under UTC oversight and require utilities to plan for them
House Bill 1514 would subject thermal energy companies (utility-scale systems that deliver heat through a network of pipes) to regulatory oversight by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) while carving out exemptions for small or already operating systems.

Committee staff explained that thermal energy networks (TENs) currently fall outside UTC regulation unless operated by a gas or electric utility. Under the bill, TENs serving five or more independent customers or more than 250 households would come under UTC jurisdiction; systems operating before July 2025 or serving small customer sets would be exempt or could opt in.

Proponents — including Quarix (a TEN developer), port and municipal sponsors, and project operators — supported proportional UTC regulation and urged clear, scale‑appropriate rules. ‘‘Quarix is supportive…provided its regulation is proportional to the size of the micro thermal utility,’’ testified Clarence Clipper.

Ports and project sponsors cited experience in Bellingham and Seattle where local district-energy systems serve housing and redevelopment sites and said UTC oversight would provide consistent customer protections. Michael Hogan from the Port of Bellingham described a situation where the port created a bespoke oversight arrangement for an affordable housing TEN customer because UTC jurisdiction did not apply.

Utilities urged caution in one specific area of the bill. Avista’s witness asked that a requirement in Section 25 — directing large electric utilities to model TENs in their integrated resource plans and to consider potential discounted rates for TENs — be removed or clarified because modeling location‑specific discounts and granular TEN assumptions in an electric IRP would be difficult and could be misplaced.

The bill also requires Commerce to award grants to local governments to map potential TEN corridors and build local technical expertise. Witnesses from contractors and mechanical firms said TENs offer a cost‑effective pathway to decarbonize heating systems at scale and can leverage local union workforces.

The committee did not take a vote during the hearing.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI