Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Bill would let parties opt into ranked-choice voting in presidential primaries, backers say it could boost turnout

January 28, 2025 | Ways and Means Committee, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Committees, Legislative, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Bill would let parties opt into ranked-choice voting in presidential primaries, backers say it could boost turnout
House Bill 215 would permit Maryland political parties to opt into ranked-choice voting (RCV) for presidential primaries beginning in 2028, sponsor Delegate Chris Fair said at the Jan. 28 Ways and Means hearing.

Supporters — including student leaders, veterans’ voting advocates, nonprofit groups and ranked-choice proponents — told the committee RCV gives voters more options, reduces ‘‘wasted’’ votes when candidates drop out and can increase participation among independents and younger voters. Witnesses cited New York City and recent municipal and statewide RCV pilots as evidence that voters learn the system quickly and that turnout and registration can increase where RCV is used.

Speakers said the bill would be voluntary for parties, not mandatory. Advocates described operational pathways and told the committee tabulation could be integrated into existing election systems with planning and voter education; they urged funding and Board of Elections leadership on voter outreach.

Opponents argued costs and implementation difficulty can be substantial, and researchers have produced mixed findings on impacts for polarization, candidate diversity and turnout. One witness cited a University of Minnesota study raising concerns that RCV does not automatically reduce negativity in campaigning or increase diversity of officeholders. Committee members questioned fiscal and education plans; supporters said the 2028 effective date allows time for planning and public information campaigns led by election officials and civic groups.

Ending note: Proponents asked the committee for a favorable report; opponents urged careful study of costs and implementation before adoption. No vote was recorded during the hearing.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI