Subcommittee reports bill to restore reregistration for certain registrants after 2020 code change

2238568 · February 6, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Public Safety subcommittee unanimously reported Senate Bill 844, a technical fix the Virginia State Police said is needed after a 2020 code rewrite removed language requiring periodic reregistration by some registrants, limiting enforcement for failures to reregister.

A Virginia General Assembly Public Safety subcommittee voted 5-0 to report Senate Bill 844, a technical fix to restore periodic reregistration requirements for certain registrants, after testimony from the Virginia State Police that a 2020 code revision inadvertently removed that requirement and limited law-enforcement enforcement.

Sponsor Sen. Amanda Craig said the bill “is basically just a little technical, common sense fix,” explaining that language in §9.1-904 was struck in 2020. Craig said that under the current text tier 1 registrants “register for that 1 year and now they don't have to re register,” and described the prior re-registration schedule as one year of initial registration followed by periodic re-registration — “tier ones… re register for 15 years unless it gets knocked down to 10 years once a year. Tier 2… have to register every 6 months for 25 years.”

Julia Gunderson of the Virginia State Police told the panel the department supports the bill. A State Police witness testified that “under the current law, law enforcement may not arrest tier 1 registrants for failure to register, which creates a public safety risk to the Commonwealth.” Committee counsel said the substitute before the subcommittee added a criminal-impact statement; counsel characterized that as the only change in the substitute.

The subcommittee’s action was procedural: Delegate Wilt moved to report the bill out of the subcommittee and the motion was seconded; the clerk closed the roll and the bill was reported 5 to 0. No amendments or conditions were recorded in the transcript.

The bill was presented as a targeted correction to statutory language rather than a policy change; the sponsor and State Police characterized it as restoring previously intended enforcement authority by reinserting re-registration requirements into the code section referenced in the bill.