TOPEKA — The Kansas Senate on Feb. 6 adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 1603, a proposed amendment to Section 1 of Article 11 of the Kansas Constitution that would limit increases in property valuations.

Senator Francisco said the measure aims to address what supporters describe as rising property tax burdens but warned the details matter. "I remain concerned that these limitations on valuation increases will create differences between existing properties and newly constructed or renovated properties," Francisco said during floor debate, noting an amendment in committee limiting valuation increases to a total of 3% during a four-year period beginning in 2022.

The debate centered on whether a valuation cap would reduce taxpayer burdens or shift costs. Senator Finney said he opposed the measure on principle. "I vote no on SCR 1603 because this constitutional amendment is not the vehicle which will solve the problem of rapidly increasing property taxes," Finney said, adding that he is open to future legislation to produce "true property tax relief." Senator Owens also voted no, saying a cap could "distort markets," shift tax burdens and "deincentivize home selling and buying."

Senators were permitted to submit written explanations of their votes to the journal. After a roll-call tally, the chamber recorded 28 ayes and 11 nays; the presiding officer declared the measure adopted.

The floor debate included questions about how a valuation cap would interact with local mill levies and the differing valuations of newer versus older properties. Opponents emphasized that local governments, which set mill levies, could still drive tax increases even if valuations were capped. Supporters said limiting valuation growth is a tool to restrain increases in property tax bills.

The measure, as a proposed constitutional amendment, will remain a legislative proposal until further constitutional procedures are completed. The Senate record shows the adoption vote as 28 in favor, 11 opposed.

Ending: The Senate moved on to other calendar business and introductions after the adoption; senators were reminded they may submit additional explanatory statements for the journal.