Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee moves Senate Bill 32 to consent calendar to cut insurer premium tax to 1.98%

February 06, 2025 | Financial Institutions and Insurance, Standing, Senate, Committees, Legislative, Kansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee moves Senate Bill 32 to consent calendar to cut insurer premium tax to 1.98%
The Senate Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee voted to advance Senate Bill 32 to the consent calendar after a staff briefing on Feb. 6. The bill would reduce the insurance company premium tax rate from 2% to 1.98% and would discontinue a remittance or credit of 1% of taxes that the department currently sends to the Insurance Department Service Regulation Fund, according to the committee briefing.

The committee heard a brief presentation from Eileen, committee staff member, who summarized the bill: “Senate Bill 32 is the bill that would reduce the insurance company premium tax rate from 2% to 1.98% And it would also discontinue the remittance that the department makes of the 1% of taxes received, and would send, discontinues that credit to the insurance department service regulation fund.”

Senator Warren moved that the committee “pass out Senate Bill 32 favorably for passage and because it's of a non controversial nature put it on the consent calendar.” Senator Francisco seconded the motion. The committee approved the motion by voice vote; no roll‑call or recorded tally was given in the hearing record.

Committee members did not register opposition during the brief work session recorded in the transcript. The chair indicated the bill would move forward on the consent agenda. No additional debate or amendments were recorded in the committee transcript for Senate Bill 32.

The committee’s action sends the bill forward for further consideration under the legislature’s consent calendar procedures; the transcript did not specify subsequent floor action timing or fiscal impacts.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Kansas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI