Milford committee hears case for three full-time firefighters, records split advisory support

2245987 · January 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members heard detailed presentation on response times and volunteer shortages; BAC recorded preliminary support with abstentions and asked for multi-year cost projections.

Milford's Budget Advisory Committee spent an extended portion of its Jan. 7 meeting on a warrant article proposing three full-time firefighter positions.

Deputy Chief Ken (presenting) described response-time differences between fully staffed and volunteer responses, citing an insurance-services metric that staff-led responses averaged 5 minutes, 56 seconds to scene versus 12 minutes, 5 seconds for non-staffed responses. Committee members and staff discussed recruitment, retention, and a staffing model the fire department presented as a potential recruitment tool.

The article before the committee would fund six months of the three positions in 2025 (estimated $277,195) with a projected full-year cost of roughly $555,399 in 2026. Committee members flagged the multi-year budget implications: the full-year cost would be incorporated into the default budget calculations and thus affect future operating budgets.

The BAC recorded a preliminary advisory vote in favor of the article, with seven members voting yes and two members abstaining. Members who abstained said they wanted additional detail on multi-year impacts and on the communication to voters about how a half-year appropriation in 2025 yields a larger recurring cost in 2026.

The committee asked staff to provide a detailed three-year projection of costs and to return with recruitment and implementation timelines before the deliberative session scheduled for Feb. 1.